From: Thomas K. B. <tkb...@ba...> - 2007-12-07 05:07:52
|
I'm getting the idea that it isn't always necessary to replace the u-boot file. I'm new to these types of devices. Is there anyway to tell when I need to change the u-boot versus when I do not. The last change I made to the u-boot file screwed up my board so I guess I'll have to send it for a reflash. It would be nice to know that I could compile a new buildroot without having to change the u-boot. It seems that as long as the u-boot is working I'll always be able to fix any mistakes without having to ship the board out. If someone would please elaborate on this I would appreciate it. Sincerely, Thomas K. Bailey Paralegal =20 K. Ronald Bailey & Associates Co. L.P.A. 220 West Market Street P.O. Box 830 Sandusky, Ohio 44871-0830 Phone: 419-625-6740 Fax: 419-625-2021 www.baileyandassoc.com -----Original Message----- From: gum...@li... [mailto:gum...@li...] On Behalf Of Marc Humphreys Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 11:57 PM To: 'General mailing list for gumstix users.' Subject: Re: [Gumstix-users] Bluetooth fixes -- please help test I'm pretty sure it will, but I need to revert to u-boot 1.1.4 and the less I play with reflashing u-boot the less chance to brick the board. I will try it though because I want a copy of the /etc dir from the original to check for differences. My 1364 build environment vaporized in the upgrade from fedora 5 to fedora 7. I do have the images though, and I know at the time I needed to work things out to get Bluetooth working as it had been in the 116X era. I thought I had saved my files off on mmc card, but I can't read most of the card with the new firmware. Not blaming the new version, because I should have unmounted it cleanly before reflashing and rebooting.=20 Its not a major issue for me at this point - it was basically just to test where things were at with 1566. It was working this morning with what I had and I didn't physically touch the hardware so I can't imagine anything broke. Just a data point for old version of the Bluetooth module on a connex motherboard. Marc -----Original Message----- From: gum...@li... [mailto:gum...@li...] On Behalf Of Brad Midgley Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 10:28 PM To: General mailing list for gumstix users. Subject: Re: [Gumstix-users] Bluetooth fixes -- please help test Marc > Hmmm. I'm guess I'm the unlucky one. I have a 400xm-bt connex with a 3130711 > module on it which until prior to today I had 1364 running Serial/ PAN etc. > without issue. Does everything work again if you revert to 1364? -- Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ gumstix-users mailing list gum...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ gumstix-users mailing list gum...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users |