|
From: Qball C. <qb...@qb...> - 2006-03-17 10:01:00
|
wwp wrote: > Hello Qball, > > > On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:27:40 +0100 Qball Cow <qb...@qb...> wrote: > > >> wwp wrote: >> >>> Hello QBall, >>> >>> >>> I wonder how I could work w/ gtodo when I'm in disconnected mode, and w/ >>> ackerTodo when I'm online. Would there be some ways for both software to >>> exchange data (I know that ackerTodo is able to export .xml, but >>> this .xml is a bit different from gtodo's one)? I really like the idea of >>> an online todo base (to share w/ other people w/ a project management >>> purpose) and ackterTodo is really neat, but I really *want* to keep up >>> working w/ gtodo locally. >>> >>> Any thought? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> >> I've taken a look at the xml export file, Its very similar to the xml >> file used in xml2, so conversion should be relatively easy. (also to the >> old gtodo format). >> There is just one problem, The tasks doesn't have a unique id in the >> exported xml file, making synchronization very tricky and very error prone. >> >> For gtodo2 I intent to make the backend modulair, so you can also use >> gtodo to open the task list of f.e. evolution data server, writing a >> backend that can work with the data stored in mysql by ackerTodo is then >> possible. >> >> I hope this answers the question? >> > > Yes, thanks for your prompt answer! I'm also in contact w/ the author of > ackerTodo and am waiting for his opinion towards that. > > > Regards, > > In the gtodo2 xml format I also plan to implement a "deleted" flag, this should help allot with synchronization with f.e. evolution. (otherwise deleted items gets re-added on sync every time.) If the author of ackerTodo wants/needs stuff to be added/changed for gtodo2 let me know, nothing isn't really "decided" yet for it. Qball |