From: Gour <gtk...@at...> - 2005-04-06 17:06:56
|
Duncan Coutts (dun...@wo...) wrote: > I suggest that it's better to make these sort of API changes before a > 1.0 release (since we'd like it to be more stable after that). So if we > think this is ok in principle, I'll email gtk2hs-users explaining the > issue and why we want to make these API changes, and listing all of > them. This should evolve into a document that we include/link in the > 0.9.8 release notes so people know what they need to change. Now it is definitely a good time to make API changes. > I don't think there are many significant ones that will actually affect > many users. I think it's probably important to explain and document this > stuff well, since I know people have complained about wxHaskell breaking > people's programs every release. It's a trade-off between a usable > maintainable API and a stable API. I think it's worth the (probably > minor) breakage before we hit 1.0. And if we're going to do it we should > try and do it all in one go. It's better to break peoples programs once > rather than several times. With the summer, Cairo will get into the game. How it can affect gtk2hs bindings? Sincerely, Gour -- Registered Linux User | #278493 GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD |