From: Jens P. <je...@ju...> - 2005-04-07 06:38:09
|
Axel Simon wrote: > On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 22:23 +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote: > >>All, >> >>I don't know why I didn't think of this before... >> >>So we all know c2hs uses loads of ram (at least for the size of C header >>files that gtk2hs throws at it). For people with less ram we can >>distribute the pre-processed .hs files. Then there's no need to run c2hs >>at all. Funny I had this on my mind too, seems like a good solution to me. :) > I can't think of a reason why your proposal breaks. I guess it's similar > to distribute the .hs files for any happy input file. We could then > choose not compile c2hs, too. Agreed, then gtk2hs should be much easier for users to build. :) > So that means we have to beg for some money so that somebody > (you or Gour?!) has more than 1G of RAM to build the > amd64 version :-) I didn't understand this comment - you mean the .hs files *are* arch dependent? (My box has about 2GB of ram fwiw.) Jens |