You can subscribe to this list here.
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(6) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(4) |
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(3) |
2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(7) |
2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
2009 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(11) |
2010 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(92) |
Dec
(41) |
2011 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(15) |
2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2013 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(11) |
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
2016 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(8) |
2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(4) |
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(40) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-03-02 22:45:33
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600164 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-03-02 22:45:25
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600164 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #146597|none |committed status| | --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-03-02 22:45:09 UTC --- Review of attachment 146597: --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=600164&attachment=146597) Thanks, committed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-03-02 22:41:11
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601748 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-03-02 22:40:59
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601748 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #147614|none |committed status| | --- Comment #2 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-03-02 22:40:45 UTC --- Review of attachment 147614: --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=601748&attachment=147614) Thanks, committed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-03-02 22:37:28
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601749 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |kaf...@gm... Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-03-02 22:37:13
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601749 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #147615|none |committed status| | --- Comment #2 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-03-02 22:37:01 UTC --- Review of attachment 147615: --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=601749&attachment=147615) Thanks, committed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-03-02 22:16:42
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609932 gnome-perl | Gnome2::Rsvg | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #153775|none |needs-work status| | --- Comment #2 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-03-02 22:16:28 UTC --- Review of attachment 153775: --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=609932&attachment=153775) Thanks for the patch (in git form even!). Just two things that need fixing before it can go in: * Since typemaps are public, and the new typemap uses a new converter, we need to properly export this converter via rsvg2perl.h. * The new methods need tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-02-17 18:15:37
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605632 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Fabio Durán Verdugo <fabio> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED CC| |fa...@gn... Resolution| |INCOMPLETE --- Comment #4 from Fabio Durán Verdugo <fa...@gn...> 2010-02-17 18:15:27 UTC --- Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-02-15 18:38:29
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610022 gnome-perl | Gnome2::PanelApplet | unspecified Summary: panel_applet_set_background_widget missed Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gnome2::PanelApplet AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: yer...@gm... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Current version do not contains panel_applet_set_background_widget method. Please-please, add it:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-02-14 18:42:51
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609932 gnome-perl | Gnome2::Rsvg | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Neil Roberts <bp...@ya...> 2010-02-14 18:42:40 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=153775) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=153775 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=609932&attachment=153775 Add bindings for rsvg_handle_get_dimensions{_sub,} This adds bindings for rsvg_handle_get_dimensions and rsvg_handle_get_dimensions_sub. They both use a new type called RsvgDimensionData which is added to the typemap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-02-14 18:42:21
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609932 gnome-perl | Gnome2::Rsvg | unspecified Summary: Add bindings for rsvg_handle_get_dimensions{_sub,} Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gnome2::Rsvg AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: bp...@ya... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Here's a patch to add bindings for rsvg_handle_get_dimensions and rsvg_handle_get_dimensions_sub. I don't know the Perl guts that well so I'm not 100% sure if this is correct but I based it on the bindings for cairo_font_extents so it should be vaguely right. It's quite hard to use Cairo backend without these functions so it would be good to have them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-02-01 21:04:43
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608730 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: Example for a tree based Gtk2::TreeModel Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: emm...@gm... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=152768) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=152768 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=608730&attachment=152768 examples/customtree.pl This patch adds a new example for a real tree model backed by a pure Perl tree object. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-01-27 09:09:23
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608006 gnome-perl | general | unspecified Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED CC| |eb...@gm... Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Emmanuele Bassi <eb...@gm...> 2010-01-27 09:09:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) there's nothing gtk+ (or pango) can do if you're running with a custom theme engine (like qtcurve) whenever you're packaging gtk+ related packages. > /root/.config/qtcurve is not among the locations that are permitted to be > reached. you should disable your own gtk+ theme when packaging - see: http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/stable/gtk-Resource-Files.html and: http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/stable/gtk-running.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-01-27 07:40:05
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608006 gnome-perl | general | unspecified --- Comment #2 from Serdar Dalgic <se...@pa...> 2010-01-27 07:39:55 UTC --- I'm packaging the program for my own distro, Pardus. We use gentoo-like sandbox system[1]. This is a special environment which prevents packages accidentally write outside of permitted locations. /root/.config/qtcurve is not among the locations that are permitted to be reached. So, is there a way to run tests without violating sandbox? Or should I disable the test violating sandbox while packaging the program? When sandbox is ignored, all tests are succesful. I hope this clarifies the reason why I entered this bug :) [1] http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/sandbox/index.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-01-26 18:53:37
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608006 gnome-perl | general | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO CC| |kaf...@gm... --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-01-26 18:53:27 UTC --- It looks like the error messages complain about the tests trying to access qtcurve's configuration directory. If that's right, that sounds perfectly normal and legal to me (assuming that you use the qtcurve gtk+ theme). I don't see what we should do differently. Can you elaborate? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-01-25 08:18:30
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608006 gnome-perl | general | unspecified Summary: perl-Pango sandbox violations while testing. Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: general AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: se...@pa... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- while testing perl-Pango 1.221 some sandbox violations occur: t/PangoContext.t ..... Sandbox violation: open (/root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5270 -> /root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5270) t/PangoFont.t ........ 1/57 Sandbox violation: open (/root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5275 -> /root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5275) t/PangoFontMap.t ..... Sandbox violation: open (/root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5280 -> /root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5280) t/PangoFontset.t ..... Sandbox violation: open (/root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5285 -> /root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5285) t/PangoLayout.t ...... Sandbox violation: open (/root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5291 -> /root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5291) t/PangoRenderer.t .... 1/7 Sandbox violation: open (/root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5297 -> /root/.config/qtcurve/gtk-icons.5297) btw, couldn't find the pango component, so I've selected the general. My perl version is 5.10.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-01-21 20:46:54
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607602 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #151874|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-01-21 20:31:24
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607602 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-01-21 20:31:03 UTC --- Looks good to me, thanks. Committed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-01-20 21:50:41
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607602 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-01-20 21:50:26 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=151874) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=151874 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=607602&attachment=151874 fix for leak -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-01-20 21:49:22
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607602 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: newSVGParamSpec() memory leak on NULL Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=151872) --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=151872) program which grows unboundedly I think the newHV() in newSVGParamSpec() leaks memory if pspec==NULL. The program foo.pl attached uses ever more more memory. I expect the HV creation might be done after the NULL check. The attached diff improves it for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-01-14 00:50:17
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604403 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #2 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-01-14 00:27:34 UTC --- I believe the gets add nothing at all to the present field accessors. Most of the separate C get funcs are unnecessary in a dynamic language like perl, but those ones are particularly useless and I would leave them out for the time being. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-01-09 19:34:25
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604403 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaf...@gm... --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-01-09 19:34:08 UTC --- The patch looks fine to me in general. But I wonder if people might not expect the getters to be there, too. Someone following the C API docs might expect to be able to call get_value(), for example. So, should we just wrap these too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-01-09 19:14:51
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604782 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #150479|none |committed status| | --- Comment #4 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-01-09 19:14:37 UTC --- Review of attachment 150479: --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=604782&attachment=150479) Committed. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2009-12-29 20:30:42
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605632 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #3 from André Klapper <a90...@gm...> 2009-12-29 20:30:12 UTC --- What is the exact link to your report in Puppy Linux, please? What exact GNOME version is this about? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2009-12-29 17:04:45
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605632 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #2 from James Simmons <jpn...@ea...> 2009-12-29 17:04:30 UTC --- Andre, I do not know how to prove this event and thus cannot. Perhaps I made a mistake in posting where I did. I've given the report to Puppy Linux. Tks, JPS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |