Menu
▾
▴
gtk2-perl-bugs — Bug reports and mail from bugzilla
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(92) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(40) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-22 05:42:00
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585215 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #3 from Ari Jolma <ari...@gm...> 2010-04-22 05:41:50 UTC --- Sorry for forgetting this. Hm. As it is in MinGW, the compiler is gcc and we need to check, which macros does it define. According to http://www.develer.com/oss/GccWinBinaries gcc in MinGW defines at least __MSVCRT_VERSION__ I'll get back to this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-21 17:41:48
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585215 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Tobias Mueller <gnome-bugs> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gnome-bugs@auftrags-killer. | |org --- Comment #2 from Tobias Mueller <gno...@au...> 2010-04-21 17:41:34 UTC --- Ari, could you address the questions raised by Torsten? Thanks in advance! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-20 21:38:23
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604403 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #149613|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-20 21:38:14
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604403 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-04-20 21:38:01 UTC --- OK, you convinced. Committed to master. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-18 16:00:47
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=614650 gnome-perl | general | unspecified --- Comment #2 from Quentin Sculo <squ...@fr...> 2010-04-18 16:00:35 UTC --- Sadly, it still crashes for me. Both with the test-case and in my program. I tested it with the perl from mandriva 2010 : perl-5.10.1 (Compile-time options: MULTIPLICITY PERL_DONT_CREATE_GVSV PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT PERL_MALLOC_WRAP USE_ITHREADS USE_LARGE_FILES USE_PERLIO USE_REENTRANT_API) and with a brand new perl-5.12.0 (Compile-time options: PERL_DONT_CREATE_GVSV PERL_MALLOC_WRAP USE_LARGE_FILES USE_PERLIO USE_PERL_ATOF) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-17 21:48:52
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616061 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: gtk_menu_attach_to_widget() free detach func immediately after called Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=158990) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158990 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=616061&attachment=158990 gtk2perl_menu_detach_func() free the detach func after called I believe the detach func in gtk_menu_attach_to_widget() is only called once and that whatever closure etc is there can be freed immediately after the detach. The benefit would be to immediately release anything captured by a closure in that detach func, as opposed to waiting until the next attach_to_widget(), which of course might be either a long time or perhaps never. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-17 21:40:40
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616059 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: g_param_spec_string default_value NULL Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=158987) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158987 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=616059&attachment=158987 ornull for g_param_spec_string I believe g_param_spec_string allows NULL for the default_value, per attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-16 22:53:03
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=614650 gnome-perl | general | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-04-16 22:52:52 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=158929) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158929 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=614650&attachment=158929 Fix a threading bug in dGPERL_CLOSURE_MARSHAL_ARGS Previously, dGPERL_CLOSURE_MARSHAL_ARGS used the dSP macro to declare the stack pointer. But dSP involves accessing the my_perl pointer which might be invalid if we've been called from a thread other than the main one. To avoid this, manually declare SV **sp first and let GPERL_CLOSURE_MARSHAL_INIT initialize it after it has set up my_perl via PERL_SET_CONTEXT. This fixes the bug with your example program on my system. Quentin, can you verify this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-16 21:34:49
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615992 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-04-16 21:11:07 UTC --- muppet commented: Sorry for not answering this sooner; there's no way to mark the sourceforge project page with a notice that we use bugzilla.gnome.org instead. The backtrace shows _gnome_vfs_canonicalize_pathname() being called from a signal handler. This implies that there is other code in the stack using signals and handlers, and that your app code's setting of IGNORE for SIGCHLD is interfering with that. However, Gtk2-Perl itself does nothing with unix signals, beyond using a mainloop event source to ensure that unix signals cause perl to get control from gtk_main(). So, i suspect the problem lies either in gnome-vfs or in perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-16 21:34:43
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615992 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: $SIG{CHLD}='IGNORE' + FileChooserDialog cause crash Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: kaf...@gm... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=158921) --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158921) test case I'm filing this on behalf of an anonymous user who submitted it to SF.net's tracker: System: Fedora Core 4 (kernel 2.6.13-1.1526_FC4) Perl: 5.8.6-15 perl-Gtk2-GladeXML-1.005-1 perl-Glib-1.100-1 perl-Gtk2-1.100-1 If a perl program does the following sequence of events: $SIG{CHLD} = 'IGNORE'; calls socketpair() to create a pair of Unix sockets; fork()s a child process that dup()s one of the sockets to STDIN and STDOUT, then exec()s an arbitrary command (for the purpose of controlling said process via the other socket); displays a main window with Gtk2; displays a FileChooserDialog() as a response to any event on the main window (say a button press); on any moment during or after the FileChooserDialog display, the parent process causes the child process to terminate (say, via a command issued through the socket, or with a kill()), or if the child process terminates by itself without any parent intervention; ... then the application crashes at the moment the child process terminates. If the application never displays the FileChooserDialog, and terminates the child process, there is no crash. If the application does not issue the $SIG{CHLD}='IGNORE', and does all the other steps, there is no crash. This is the backtrace of the crash as seen by gdb: [alex@srv64 perl]$ gdb perl GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.21rh) Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux-gnu"...(no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (gdb) set args Gtk2-FileChooser-test.pl (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/perl Gtk2-FileChooser-test.pl Reading symbols from shared object read from target memory...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded system supplied DSO at 0xcdd000 (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) ... (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208550496 (LWP 20374)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) ... (no debugging symbols found) Detaching after fork from child process 20379. (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) Entering sub loadDir... (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) ... (no debugging symbols found) [New Thread -1211561040 (LWP 20384)] [New Thread -1211970640 (LWP 20385)] You aborted. Leaving sub loadDir... gatito lindo Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1208550496 (LWP 20374)] 0x00000001 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x00000001 in ?? () #1 0x023b9599 in _gnome_vfs_canonicalize_pathname () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #2 <signal handler called> #3 0x00cdd402 in __kernel_vsyscall () #4 0x00617221 in ___newselect_nocancel () from /lib/libc.so.6 #5 0x007780dd in _XEnq () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #6 0x007784d7 in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #7 0x00779908 in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #8 0x0079a31e in XkbGetState () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 #9 0x0431ee15 in gdk_keymap_get_entries_for_keyval () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 #10 0x0431f0b1 in gdk_keymap_get_direction () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 #11 0x043155f6 in gdk_screen_get_setting () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 #12 0x04316d55 in gdk_screen_get_setting () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 #13 0x04316dcb in gdk_screen_get_setting () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 #14 0x00bdd4ce in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #15 0x00be04d6 in g_main_context_check () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #16 0x00be07c3 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #17 0x040eba46 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #18 0x00ecdbbb in XS_Gtk2_main () from /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Gtk2/Gtk2.so #19 0x0036a98c in Perl_pp_entersub () from /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE/libperl.so #20 0x0034c6e1 in Perl_runops_debug () from /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE/libperl.so #21 0x002fefe1 in perl_run () from /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE/libperl.so #22 0x080493f4 in main () (gdb) quit The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) y [alex@srv64 perl]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-15 00:04:14
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615796 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: TextMark ornull returns Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=158765) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158765 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=615796&attachment=158765 TextMark ornull returns Gtk2::TextMark get_name and get_buffer could have _ornull to show "or undef" in the docs (an anonymous mark, or a mark deleted from a buffer). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-13 00:33:34
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613972 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Kevin Ryde <user42> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #157124|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #3 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-04-13 00:24:34 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=158565) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158565 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=613972&attachment=158565 using gtk_window_transient_for This one using transient_for the same as the gtk code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 23:15:27
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615589 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-04-12 23:15:15 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=158556) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158556 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=615589&attachment=158556 the words -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 23:15:17
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615587 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #3 from muppet <sc...@as...> 2010-04-12 23:15:03 UTC --- Review of attachment 158552: --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=615587&attachment=158552) Very nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 23:14:03
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615587 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Kevin Ryde <user42> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #158552|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #2 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-04-12 23:13:49 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=158554) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158554 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=615587&attachment=158554 the right words this time Oops, wrong diff file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 23:13:27
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615585 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #1 from muppet <sc...@as...> 2010-04-12 23:13:15 UTC --- Review of attachment 158539: --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=615585&attachment=158539) Looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 23:11:50
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615587 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-04-12 23:11:39 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=158552) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158552 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=615587&attachment=158552 the words -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 23:10:16
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615597 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-04-12 23:10:02 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=158551) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158551 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=615597&attachment=158551 the words Grr, attachment went wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 23:07:43
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615598 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-04-12 23:07:33 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=158550) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158550 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=615598&attachment=158550 the words mentioned! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 23:02:24
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615598 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: Style get_style_property docs Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- The Gtk2::Style get_style_property() docs might be polished a little per below. In particular I found it disconcerting to see a sample call of get_property() under get_style_property() when the former firstly does nothing and secondly is not the func being described :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 22:54:48
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615597 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: Bindings activate docs keyval vs keycode Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- I was bitten for about the fifth time by keyval vs keycode on gtk_bindings_activate(). This couple of words might keep others from making the same mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 22:04:23
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615589 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: Signal docs show accumulator sample call instead of in words Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- This is an idea to have the Glib::Object::Subclass docs show a sample call of the accumulator function. I find a bit of semi-code much easier to follow than a description of the args in words, especially when skimming for a refresher. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 21:56:46
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615587 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: GType docs xref Glib::Object::Subclass on accumulator Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Glib::Type->register_object has only a couple of words on the accumulator parameter. It could helpfully cross reference Glib::Object::Subclass for the details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-12 21:51:13
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615585 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Summary: Object docs of get and set methods Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: Normal Component: Glib AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=158539) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=158539 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=615585&attachment=158539 get and set method docs Further to the mailing list on GObject vs GtkStyle get/set and get_property/set_property, perhaps the Glib::Object docs could have a few words like attached, to note the overriding in subclasses. Making it a =head2 will allow the Gtk2::TreeModel and Gtk2::Style docs to cross reference it for their overriding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-04-03 00:54:48
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613973 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Kevin Ryde <user42> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #157125|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-04-03 00:53:51 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=157782) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=157782 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=613973&attachment=157782 second effort G_EVAL popup() Err, umm, that looks a bit doubtful on re-reading. I think $popup_runs was to allow it to skip if the menu doesn't pop up. Is the the reason for $i_know_you? At any rate second effort attached. (I've lately tried to get the tabs mode right from my .emacs, but I'm also forever switching between my own xs-mode based on c-mode, and plain text-mode or pod-mode the xs directives upset the C parsing ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
13 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
