Menu
▾
▴
gtk2-perl-bugs — Bug reports and mail from bugzilla
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(105) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(92) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(8) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(40) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-12 13:38:03
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635950 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-12-12 13:37:49 UTC --- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-12 13:38:02
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635950 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #175382|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-10 21:23:16
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636990 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-12-10 21:22:59 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=176210) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=176210 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=636990&attachment=176210 patch and test case -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-10 21:22:05
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636990 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: gtk_buildable_get_internal_child() return ornull Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=176209) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=176209 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=636990&attachment=176209 patch Further to the bit about buildable GET_INTERNAL_CHILD returning undef, I think the gtk_buildable_get_internal_child() return could be marked ornull. Don't suppose it affects anything but the docs, and they're suppressed, but in the interests of accuracy perhaps a "GObject_ornull*". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-08 22:22:28
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636822 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified --- Comment #1 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-12-08 22:22:16 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=176106) --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=176106) leaking program -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-08 22:21:55
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636822 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: CellLayout SET_CELL_DATA_FUNC memory leak Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=176105) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=176105 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=636822&attachment=176105 patch As mentioned on the mailing list, the way GtkCellLayout.xs wrangles the C callback func to SET_CELL_DATA_FUNC() seems to leak memory. The program attached uses ever more memory. Perhaps a note for the docs for now, and a todo test case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-08 22:07:27
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636819 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: TreeSortable SET_SORT_FUNC memory leak Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=176104) --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=176104) leaking program As mentioned on the mailing list, the way GtkTreeSortable.xs wrangles the C callback func to SET_SORT_FUNC() seems to leak memory. The program attached uses ever more memory. I suppose the newCONSTSUB using a name based on the pointer addr makes a permanent addition to the symbol table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-07 21:36:57
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621259 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-12-07 21:36:40 UTC --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-07 21:36:53
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621259 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #163345|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-07 21:29:30
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620910 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-12-07 21:29:15 UTC --- I tweaked a few things (mainly: SvGChar) and committed. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-07 21:29:29
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620910 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #162981|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-06 22:27:20
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636653 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: RecentManager pod L<> links Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=175971) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=175971 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=636653&attachment=175971 patch A couple of dubious L<> links in GtkRecentManager.xs which my podlinkcheck program picked up. The "add_full" one could be an internal link, but doing so requires the full head2 text which is fairly tedious. I think saying "above" may be enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-06 22:06:41
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579103 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #3 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-12-06 22:06:27 UTC --- Hmm. Yes, that looks a bit unnecessary in retrospect. The current \&Glib::Log::default_handler should be good enough, and may even be desirable if someone has changed it with wrapper code or something. But what do we think of \&Glib::Log::default_handler at the perl level anyway? It seems tempting to forget that and let undef mean the default handler, even if at the C level NULL doesn't mean that (and is not allowed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-05 17:51:53
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579103 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified --- Comment #2 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-12-05 17:51:43 UTC --- Review of attachment 132736: --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=579103&attachment=132736) Sorry for the huge delay. One question below, otherwise the patch looks great. ::: GLog.xs @@ +207,3 @@ + default_handler_coderef = newRV_inc ((SV*) cv); + } +#endif Is the risk of someone overwriting Glib::Log::default_handler really worth having a global pointer and executing this code on startup for each and every program? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-12-01 20:11:44
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636249 gnome-perl | general | unspecified Summary: Docs - FAQ errors for installing Binary packages Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: general AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: des...@gm... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Greetings, In the GTK FAQ (http://live.gnome.org/GTK2-Perl/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#Are_there_Pre-built_Packages_available.3F) I came across three issues that need updating: 1) GIMP does not seem to ship with GTK anymore. I had to get the GTK+ Runtime Environment from http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gladewin32/gtk-2.8.20-win32-1.exe. 2) The default location of the GTK /bin directory for this installer is C:\GTK\bin, or <INSTALL_PATH>\bin. This was added automatically to the path for this installer. 3) Installing the required PPDs with ActiveState perl 5.12 only required a `ppm install Bundle::Gnome2`. Note that these updates seem small, but figuring this all out took me several hours that I wouldn't want anyone else to go through. -Michael Gower -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-29 20:12:45
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636079 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |kaf...@gm... Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-11-29 20:12:29 UTC --- You're right, we haven't wrapped this yet. Patches welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-29 18:52:08
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636079 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: Missing Gtk2::Entry->new_with_buffer Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: ti...@gu... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- According to the Gtk documentation, [1] the Gtk2::Entry object has a new_with_buffer constructor. This should be exposed to Perl. [1] http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/GtkEntry.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-28 00:24:54
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635809 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Kevin Ryde <user42> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #175274|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-11-28 00:24:43 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=175394) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=175394 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=635809&attachment=175394 patch Sounds close. I tweaked the comments per attached. Feel free to write something more. The only thing I further wondered was whether a GValue to SV like this might look at the NOCOPY flag, or whatever the public form of that is, and copy if the memory belongs to the GValue or just use the pointer if it belongs to someone else. That might apply generally in a few places, or it might be a bit too subtle, I'm not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-27 23:42:16
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622774 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Kevin Ryde <user42> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #164660|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #2 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-11-27 23:42:06 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=175392) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=175392 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=622774&attachment=175392 patch and test cases Ah, G_LIKELY, yep. Tempting to drop it, but I think I like it well enough to just have a fallback. I suppose a fallback could go in gperl-private.h or something if it was to be sprayed around a lot of places. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-27 22:39:33
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625538 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Kevin Ryde <user42> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #166750|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from Kevin Ryde <us...@zi...> 2010-11-27 22:39:18 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=175389) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=175389 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=625538&attachment=175389 patch and test cases This one with the get funcs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-27 21:19:45
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635950 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Summary: Region spans_intersect_foreach() empty input Classification: Bindings Product: gnome-perl Version: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: Normal Component: Gtk2 AssignedTo: gtk...@li... ReportedBy: us...@zi... QAContact: gtk...@li... GNOME target: --- GNOME version: --- Created an attachment (id=175382) View: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=175382 Review: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=635950&attachment=175382 patch and test case This is the bit I mentioned before and prematurely exercised allowing an empty input array to gdk_region_spans_intersect_foreach(). That func accepts n_spans==0, which I take to mean that empty input can reasonably be allowed in the bindings. But the bindings have to avoid passing spans==NULL which a g_new0 would give. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-27 15:42:59
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634350 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #174088|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-27 15:42:59
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634350 gnome-perl | Glib | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-11-27 15:42:44 UTC --- Oh, good catch! Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-27 14:29:32
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622324 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #175206|none |committed status| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-11-27 14:29:22
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622324 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-11-27 14:29:11 UTC --- Looks good, especially the POD addition. Committed. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |
13 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
