Re: [gst-devel] hi-di-ho

[Tim J. <ml...@tj...>]

On Monday 05 August 2002 12:10, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> please give http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89836 a look.
> Should I remove gst_element_[sg]et_name ? are there objections ?

BTW other functions, that duplicate GstObject functions, are:
gst_element_get_parent (calls gst_object_set_parent)
gst_element_set_parent (calls GST_OBJECT_PARENT)

bye...