Re: [gst-devel] element documentation uri as part of GstElementDetails

[Andy W. <wi...@po...>]

Hey Stefan,

Stefan Kost <en...@ho...> writes:

> I guess I made this harder that it would have been, by adding
> gst_element_class_set_details_simple() in the last release. WHile there is space
> in struct _GstElementDetails, I can't easily add a parameter to a function
> signature. Would it make sense to deprecate it and replace it with a varargs
> based funtion? Any naming sugestions?

If you did this you would also need a non-varargs variant for bindings,
which would be a pain (to write and to wrap). Why not just a separate
function call, gst_element_class_set_help_uri(), if in fact this is a
function worth having.

Regards,

Andy.
-- 
http://wingolog.org/