Theres a patch available against the 0.3 sourcecode to
implement a tunnel of type 'socks'. The naming will probably
change to 'dynamic' in the future, but this will do for now.
I will attach it to this request - so please test it... and
report your findings :)
Note that the 'host' and second 'port' are still mandatory
in the interface; however unused when choosing type 'socks'.
I will ofcourse fix that when this patch gets applied into
the gstm code.
The patch was gracefully provided by Johan Christiansen;
credits for this one go to him ;)
Johan, if you should read this, please contact me by other
means (eg. other email or msn) than your .it host since it
can't be resolved (NXDOMAIN) so I can't reply :(
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=361180
Theres a patch available against the 0.3 sourcecode to
implement a tunnel of type 'socks'. The naming will probably
change to 'dynamic' in the future, but this will do for now.
I will attach it to this request - so please test it... and
report your findings :)
Note that the 'host' and second 'port' are still mandatory
in the interface; however unused when choosing type 'socks'.
I will ofcourse fix that when this patch gets applied into
the gstm code.
The patch was gracefully provided by Johan Christiansen;
credits for this one go to him ;)
Johan, if you should read this, please contact me by other
means (eg. other email or msn) than your .it host since it
can't be resolved (NXDOMAIN) so I can't reply :(
Dynamic Forward patch against 0.3
Logged In: YES
user_id=361180
This feature is implemented in current code and will be available
in next upcoming release.