Re: [Grinder-use] Bad TPS number reported by the console
Distributed load testing framework - Java, Jython, or Clojure scripts.
Brought to you by:
philipa
|
From: olivier m. <ome...@gm...> - 2013-10-11 16:45:48
|
Hello Phil, I really don't understand, i have used your new instrumentation method and i have still the problem if i launch one thread with 2 runs, i have: Thread, Run, Test, Start time (ms since Epoch), Test time, Errors, SyncML 0, 0, 1, 1381509722862, 1, 0, 0.0 0, 1, 1, 1381509722867, 0, 0, 0.0 0, 1, 1, 1381509722867, 0, 0, 0.0 0, 1, 1, 1381509722867, 0, 0, 0.0 0, 1, 1, 1381509722867, 0, 0, 0.0 0, 1, 1, 1381509722867, 0, 0, 0.0 0, 1, 1, 1381509722867, 2, 0, 0.0 0, 1, 1, 1381509722871, 0, 0, 0.0 as you can see, the run 1 is executed 7 times. Very strange ?? Do you have an idea on how i can trace the instrumentation ? cheers, Olivier 2013/10/6 Philip Aston <ph...@ma...> > This is to do with what you are instrumenting, not the logging. > > getattr will return some internal Jython object that represents the bound > method. You're instrumenting all methods of this internal Jython object. > When you invoke it, the call path is crossing multiple (7!) instrumented > methods, but that's completely down to how Jython is implemented. > > Instead I think you should try to instrument the sendData method itself. > Try something like: > > Test(...).record(impl.sendData) > > ... > > spResp = impl.sendData(....) > > > - Phil > > > > > > On 02/10/13 10:35, olivier merlin wrote: > > Hello, > > I try to switch our grinder framework to grinder 3.11 and i get a > problem on the TPS count. > > When i inject a constant rate of 3 TPS, after a period of X minutes, the > console write a throughput of 21 TPS so x7 the real throughput. > > When looking in the grinder-data_X.log file i see that 3 thread per > second is there but each threads write in the data log 7 times ! > > I'm quite sure it's a problem of instrumentation somewhere similar to > the bug entered by Phil on the #234 helloworld sample double counts<http://sourceforge.net/p/grinder/bugs/234/> > > *We are using the old way for instrumenting:* > (...) > testSubmit = Test(testId, line.getTestName()).wrap(getattr(impl, > "sendData")) > (...) > spResp = testSubmit(submitCmd, line.isMemorized(),line.getLastTemplate(), > self.memMgr) > (...) > > The impl is a protocol implementation that may change between test - > that implements sendData() method. > The problem is perhaps that i switch the logs to logback (grinder.logger) > in all the implementations (like the #234) ... thus leading to a test > record for each logging ? > > Do i have to completely change my way of instrumenting ? > Or do i have to use distinct logger from the grinder.logger to avoid this > king of problem ... > > Does someone encounter the same trouble ? > > cheers, > Olivier > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most > from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > grinder-use mailing list > gri...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/grinder-use > > |