From: Eric B. <er...@go...> - 2006-04-17 22:01:13
|
Colin Paul Adams wrote: > Eric> So, as a compromise, why not replacing: > > Eric> gobo2html.xsl gobo2html2.xsl > > Eric> (for which it is not obvious from the outside which one to > Eric> choose) > > The latter was supposed to be renamed to the former (which is for the > older version of gobodoc, without namespaces) I know that I'm a real pain today (sorry about that), and that we already discussed that before, but I still have trouble to see the real advantage in prefixing all element names with "gobodoc:". I remember that there was something to do with being able to use elements from several grammars (e.g. gobodoc and eiffel) in the same document, but we didn't go that far yet (we don't have a separate grammar of eiffel yet). In fact that something that I should try to experiment with as soon as possible. Indeed I will soon have to write plenty of doc explaining the internals of the Gobo Eiffel compiler, and it will probably be a good opportunity for me to first document the way to write documentation in the Gobo project, with all the gobodoc elements and eiffel elements explained (if I manage to make them work together). -- Eric Bezault mailto:er...@go... http://www.gobosoft.com |