Re: [Gnugle-developers] Re: Status
Brought to you by:
brotkaeppchen,
mlhuehue
|
From: Daniel K. G. <dk...@co...> - 2004-01-24 17:18:06
|
* Marco Lange <ma...@ma...> [040124 12:37]: Hi Marco, > To what the discussion about the language is concerned I would propose > English so that non-german-speaking people who are interested in the > project can retrieve information from the mailing lists archives later > in the project. full ack! > Yes :) IRC could be good for brainstorming sessions and so on. I am not > an IRC user at all, but we could use IRC as a means of quickly > discussion ideas and proposals. The disadvantage of IRC is, that, in > contrast to our wiki or the mailinglist, it is not archived. Thus, when > we should happen to have lengthier important discussion on IRC, we > should sum up the main results in the Wiki and send the IRC log to the > mailinglist for archival. Ok. I'm already in #gnugle at freenode. Hopefully you'll join also. 18:10 -!- con-fuse [~dk...@pc...] has joined #gnugle 18:10 -!- ServerMode/#gnugle [+n] by saberhagen.freenode.net 18:10 [Users #gnugle] > BTW: The mailinglist can be configured to set a Reply-To header to the > mailinglist. Shall I do this? I personally use mutt as MUA and this list is configured as mailinglist in my .muttrc. When I wanna reply to the list I just press shift-L and the reply to is set correctly. So if someone sets a follow-up header it will also send CC to the one. In short: If you use a good and rfc compatible MUA this should be no problem and not needed to change the Reply-To header. peace, daniel -- Daniel K. Gebhart http://dkg.con-fuse.org/ Institute for Computer Science University of Innsbruck Fon: (office): +43 512 507 6444 Mail: <daniel.gebhart(at)uibk.ac.at> |