Thread: [Gnubiff-devel] Releasing 2.0.3?
Brought to you by:
nicolasrougier,
sowadart
From: Robert S. <sow...@gm...> - 2004-11-17 13:38:12
|
Hi, I fixed some bugs in the last weeks (mostly IMAP related). Should we release a new version of gnubiff? CU Robert :-) -- Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail + 3 Top-Spielfilme auf DVD ++ Jetzt kostenlos testen http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail ++ |
From: Nicolas R. <Nic...@lo...> - 2004-11-17 14:22:33
|
Hi Robert, Sure we can. I have a hard time at the moment because I have lot of work to do and I've been away last week. I will try to do that this week (regular places where I put releases are sf.net, freshmeat.net and gnomefile.orgas well as gnome announces mailing list). Also, I think I need to put "new" version on CVS. Maybe we need to move 2.0.3 as a branch and use last one as the major version, what do you think ? Nico Robert Sowada wrote: > Hi, > > I fixed some bugs in the last weeks (mostly IMAP related). Should we release > a new version of gnubiff? > > CU Robert :-) > |
From: Robert S. <sow...@gm...> - 2004-11-17 14:57:47
|
Hi Nicolas, > Sure we can. I have a hard time at the moment because I have lot of work > to do and I've been away last week. I will try to do that this week > (regular places where I put releases are sf.net, freshmeat.net and > gnomefile.orgas well as gnome announces mailing list). It is not urgent (no serious bugs; many small bugfixes; some IMAP features: international mailboxes, don't get whole mail, only head of first "text/plain" part etc.; no need for "--gtk" option; the ChangeLog is quite long in the meantime), release it when you have time. Another issue: Bugreport 1059329 of Iulian Tocu I finally figured out that this problem is not related to imap. The problem is the following: If "s.open (hostname_, port_, use_ssl_)" (in "src/mailbox.cc") fails updating is stopped (easily reproducable: replace "s.open..." by zero). I am not too familar with the threading code of gnubiff, so if you know where to look you could save me a lot of time (BTW: This call is also present in 2.1.1, I didn't test if the problem is still present in 2.1.1). [If this bug isn't easily solved you can assign it to me on sourceforge] I do not understand the other bugreport 1062153. > Also, I think I need to put "new" version on CVS. Maybe we need to move > 2.0.3 as a branch and use last one as the major version, what do you > think? I do not understand exactly what you are writing. If you mean putting "2.0.X" and "2.1.1" simultaneously on CVS I think it's a good idea. In the moment I can fix bugs only in "2.0.X", but most of them are also present in "2.1.1". CU Robert :-) -- Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail + 3 Top-Spielfilme auf DVD ++ Jetzt kostenlos testen http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail ++ |