Menu
▾
▴
gmarathon-general
|
From: Ignacio J. O. <na...@si...> - 2003-12-01 10:49:21
|
Hola TIlo: > Hi Ignacio, > first of all, don't feel offended by my arguments, it was=20 > late yesterday when > I finally managed to make a official snaphot again and had to=20 > cope with a lot > of stuff I never seen before, so I maybe just missed to tell=20 > you that I fully > appreciate the work you did at our build system and also in=20 > Want itself. So > no need for bad blood :-) >=20 Hey, i know, monday is for everyone, not only me, i'm very sorry of sounded harsh, was not the intention.. no bad blood, we are a team, at least we are trying to be a team.. :)) > Hmm have you also tried to to a official snapshot? That was=20 > one of the main > ideas when I originally introduced Want to Marathon. > Anyway, except the lib dirs, are you experiencing any other=20 > issues with my changes? > Should I rollback them? >=20 No, if that worked for you, better to work out the bloddy details together, i'll try to look at the your changes, and solve the little issues we have.. > Maybe we should separate those references to a external file=20 > which doesn't reside > in CVS? >=20 That was the idea ( something similiar is done in jakarta projects with ant ), a build.properties file, that stores all the lib paths, and it's not strored directly in cvs as itself, but a s a sample, something like build.properties.sample, anyone should adjust this file to his needs, and lately > No I don't think so, if you demand spaces feel free to use=20 > them. I'm just thin > that tabs are more easier to handle in most editors. Do you=20 > have experienced > any probs with tabs in your environment or whats the reason? >=20 This are religion wars, i have no problem by trying to fullfill any tabs requeriment, if this decision is done at least democratically amongst committers, what others think? > Maybe there is something wrong with my build environment but=20 > somehow the files > in Common aren't found during the build until I add them as a=20 > library path. > I look into this. >=20 Ok, we'll try to develop a consensus about the build process first let deal with this detail in tha process.. > I'm not asking about the template files, they work just fine!=20 > Please take a > look at the official_snapshots target. With Touchbuild we=20 > simply increased the > build number in release.ini and afterwards committed them to=20 > have the latest > also in CVS. Maybe you just give me a hint how to achieve=20 > that with Want. >=20 Ouch, you are right, i did forget this, i'll add the necessary want bits to the "binary_snapshot" target, just copying them from want itself.. :) > Yep agreed, maybe together with the lib paths we can so=20 > completely separate > the things someone must adjust before building from the build=20 > logic itself. > What do you think? >=20 Totally agreed, if you dont mind, i'll try to the changes this morning, and we can test them tomorrow or this evening.. =20 > Maybe that's the reason for all the confusion ;) It seems=20 > that CVS don't like > such paths in general so I just keep <arg value=3D"./dist/*.zip"/> . >=20 I advice you to use cygwin's ssh, as it makes all the terminal programns and things unnecesary, this will lower the barrier another bit more, AFAIK almost everyone is using cygwin for this tasks... Saludos, Ignacio J. Ortega |
|
From: Tilo M. <tm...@al...> - 2003-12-01 12:15:09
|
Ignacio, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > Hey, i know, monday is for everyone, not only me, i'm very sorry of > sounded harsh, was not the intention.. no bad blood, we are a team, at > least we are trying to be a team.. :)) Fully agreed. > No, if that worked for you, better to work out the bloddy details > together, i'll try to look at the your changes, and solve the little > issues we have.. OK when you look at the diff you can see that I "only" changed the paths and the stuff in official_build, ah and not to forget the tabs *bg* > That was the idea ( something similiar is done in jakarta projects with > ant ), a build.properties file, that stores all the lib paths, and it's > not strored directly in cvs as itself, but a s a sample, something like > build.properties.sample, anyone should adjust this file to his needs, > and lately Sounds like a plan, I look into this later today. >> No I don't think so, if you demand spaces feel free to use them. I'm just thin >> that tabs are more easier to handle in most editors. Do you have experienced >> any probs with tabs in your environment or whats the reason? >> > > > This are religion wars, i have no problem by trying to fullfill any tabs > requeriment, if this decision is done at least democratically amongst > committers, what others think? I vote for tabs! *vbg* >> Yep agreed, maybe together with the lib paths we can so completely separate >> the things someone must adjust before building from the build logic itself. >> What do you think? >> > > > Totally agreed, if you dont mind, i'll try to the changes this morning, > and we can test them tomorrow or this evening.. OK, feel free to take a look, I'm waiting for your reply. >> Maybe that's the reason for all the confusion It seems that CVS don't like >> such paths in general so I just keep <arg value="./dist/*.zip"/> . >> > > > I advice you to use cygwin's ssh, as it makes all the terminal programns > and things unnecesary, this will lower the barrier another bit more, > AFAIK almost everyone is using cygwin for this tasks... Maybe I should really try to use Cygwin, until now I haven't because it seems to me like a big beast, at least because I just need cvs, ssh and scp > Saludos, > Ignacio J. Ortega -- Regards, Tilo Muetze -- Marathon - The SQL Tool for Firebird & InterBase http://gmarathon.sourceforge.net |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X