From: levent <mli...@ya...> - 2001-12-02 09:43:17
|
--- "Mike A. Harris" <mh...@re...> wrote: > On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, levent wrote: > > >> >last note: i have tried them with this > >> configuration: > >> >gcc-2.95.3, asus p2b, 128mb ram, p2-350, nvidia > >> tnt2u, > >> >lots of nvidia drivers > >> > >> /me wonders what an Nvidia user would be looking > at > >> Glide for. > >> ;o) > >> > >> > > > >sorry, my english isn't good really. i cannot > >understand what do you mean. if you mean writing > glide > >emulators, my target isn't it. i'm just a graphic > card > >enhaustiant. 3dfx did a very educational card. it's > >easy to understand and easy to change drivers for > >debug. also it supports lots of compressed image > >formats (i mean yuv, ai88 whatever..) in hardware. > >i also looked nvidias xfree4 2d drivers. it's not > easy > >as glide of course. if i can, i will convert > utah-glx > >nvidia drivers to xfree4.. soon :). > > Glide is for 3dfx hardware only. That is why I > joked about it. > People compiling glide on a machine with non-3dfx > hardware, are > building useless code. ;o) > > Nvidia drivers that come with XFree86 are 2D only. > To get 3D you > need to use Nvidia's binary only drivers which are > unsupported. > > Neither of them use glide or have anything to do > with glide. > > Hence the humor. ;o) :) i feel like moron who can't understand jokes. but there is no problem. glide on nvidia hardware is sometimes behaves better than nvidia drivers. because nvidia drivers everytime freeze machine completely. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com |