From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2007-05-28 16:58:43
|
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 20:27:23 -0400 From: Robert L Krawitz <rl...@al...> One quirk I've noticed, though, is that the head moves faster when using the 360 DPI raster. It may be that there will be little difference in performance in bidirectional mode between these two settings. If that turns out to be the case, then perhaps we can offer more conventional settings, and the drivers really could be identical except for the carriage width. It turns out that there's a substantial difference in performance -- it took about 58 seconds to print a page in 720 DPI mode vs. 102 seconds in 720 DPI high quality. So whatever difference there may be in print head speed, it doesn't come close to making up for the extra passes needed. I think that based on this there is use for both 720 and 720x360 modes (regular and high quality/enhanced) on the 1400. On plain paper there's actually very little difference between any of them. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |