Re: [Gfs-users] SurfaceBc T Dirichlet 1
Brought to you by:
popinet
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Gfs-users] SurfaceBc T Dirichlet 1
|
From: Jose M. López-H. S. <jos...@gm...> - 2017-04-05 10:40:51
|
Addendum: Also, to impose contact lines in solids is also problematic. In fact I was unable to simulate liquid bridges when one extreme is a solid. Jose 2017-04-05 12:34 GMT+02:00 Jose M. López-Herrera Sánchez < jos...@gm...>: > Hi Jean, > > As far as I know BcAngle (contact angle) is not implemented for solids. > > Cheers > > Jose > > 2017-04-05 2:29 GMT+02:00 Marie-Jean Thoraval <Marie-Jean.Thoraval@ > polytechnique.edu>: > >> Dear Gerris users, >> >> I am trying to make a solid surface inside the domain wetting with the >> following boundary condition: >> >> SurfaceBc T Dirichlet 1 >> >> where T is a VariableTracerVOFHeight. >> But this boundary condition on the solid surface does not seem to do >> anything on the contact angle. The solid surface still de-wets with a 90° >> contact angle. >> >> I have found another post related: >> >> "I tried to run two simulations with the conditions you suggested : >> - SurfaceBc T Dirichlet 0 >> - SurfaceBc T Dirichlet 1 >> where T is VOF tracer, but the result is the same and it is a right angle >> contact angle at the wall." >> https://sourceforge.net/p/gfs/mailman/message/22683647/ >> >> >> Is this condition not enough to impose a wetting surface, or is it not >> working with SurfaceBc? >> Is is possible to make a wetting solid surface inside the domain in >> Gerris? >> >> Best regards, >> Marie-Jean. >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Gfs-users mailing list >> Gfs...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gfs-users >> >> > |