|
From: Andrea A. <and...@ge...> - 2014-01-14 17:48:10
|
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Kevin Smith <ks...@bo...>wrote: > Sorry, gmail decided to spontaneously send before I had finished writing > that email. > Ah, these evolution of artificial intelligence worry me... > > > On 14 January 2014 09:16, Kevin Smith <ks...@bo...> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 14 January 2014 01:02, Andrea Aime <and...@ge...>wrote: >> >>> >>> I hope so, I've tried to make it a clean refactor, basically just moved >>> the request cascading code back in WMSLayer while >>> making the operation pluggable, and added a test for it that was not >>> there before (request cascading was not tested at all). >>> Finally, did some interactive testing in the stand alone version to make >>> sure it's working as expected. >>> >>> So.. any feedback? Should I prepare a pull request against the 1.5.x >>> branch? >>> Also, were all the fixes ported to the 1.5.x branch, if so, we could >>> release from it no? >>> >> >> The fixes for the BDB Disk Quota store not setting up its version >> tracking file (#202) and for GetCapabilitiesConfiguration being broken and >> having out of date documentation (#196) have been backported to 1.5.x the >> other changes are only on master at the moment. >> > > Whatever gets released this weekend, I'd really like to get everything > that made it into master to go out rather than having to wait another 6 > months. Whether that means backporting all of it to 1.5.x, calling master > 1.5.1 and branching a new master for 1.6, or doing 1.5.1 and 1.6-beta > together. > Whatever is less work works for me... do we have many commits to cherry-pick on 1.5.x? Otherwise calling master 1.5.x and the current 1.5.x something like 1.5.0.x would be quick enough. > > I've only had a chance to give a quick look at the proxy layer patch, but > it seems OK for backporting to me. > Nice. Can I merge? :-) > >> >>> >>>> >>>> Regardless of what's done, I'll be moving this weekend so I'm probably >>>> not going to have time to to do a release (and certainly not 2 of them if >>>> we do both 1.5.1 and 1.6-beta together) >>>> >>> >>> I may be able to help. What's the release procedure? >>> >> >> > The release procedure is in RELEASE_NOTES.txt. > Is it? https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/blob/master/RELEASE_NOTES.txt To me that looks like a changelog :-) > I think it uses the same credentials to push the finished artifacts to the > maven repository as for a GeoServer release. The web page has moved to a > new server since I did the 1.4.0 release, I think Justin knows the > credentials for logging in. > Justin, is that something that can be done from outside Boundless? Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it ------------------------------------------------------- |