Re: [Geotools-gt2-users] GeoPackage append SimpleFeature example?

[Athanasios M. <man...@gm...>]

(OK, I'm new to this part of the GeoTools ecosystem, so apologies for my 
questions.)

Do you mean that I should initially create a GeoPackage with an existing 
JDBCDataStore (in my case, using a SpatiaLiteDataSourceFactory)? Because 
I can't seem to find a way to access GeoPackage's datastore...

Thanks again,
Thanassis Mantes

On 21/12/2017 3:53 μμ, Andrea Aime wrote:
> HI Athanasios,
> while I cannot share examples for the low level API, why don't you 
> directly use the JDBCDataStore one
> built on top of it? It should make it no different than writing to 
> shapefile, postgis and the like
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Athanasios Mantes <man...@gm... 
> <mailto:man...@gm...>> wrote:
>
>     Hi list,
>
>     I recently posted an email with a question about Geotools and
>     exporting large numbers of SimpleFeatures to GeoJSON format. In
>     the meanwhile I decided to check out the GeoPackage format case,
>     in order to try and export my data to GeoPackage file instead of
>     GeoJSON. However, I'm having a hard time understanding how I can
>     append SimpleFeatures to an already existing FeatureEntry in the
>     GeoPackage. I searched the forum and I came across some posts that
>     mentioned this case, however, links with sample code were dead.
>     Can anyone post a dimple exmaple or point me to a code snippet?
>
>     Thanks in advance
>
>     Thanassis Mantes
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>     _______________________________________________
>     GeoTools-GT2-Users mailing list
>     Geo...@li...
>     <mailto:Geo...@li...>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrea Aime
>
> ==GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit 
> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.==Ing. Andrea Aime 
> @geowolfTechnical LeadGeoSolutions S.A.S.Via di Montramito 3/A55054 
>  Massarosa (LU)phone: +39 0584 962313fax: +39 0584 1660272mob: +39 
>  339 8844549http://www.geo-solutions.ithttp://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o 
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. 
> Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del 
> messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora 
> riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo 
> cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla 
> distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. 
> Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, 
> distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità 
> diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal 
> D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely 
> for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be 
> confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of 
> privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New 
> Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any 
> disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either 
> dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except 
> previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the 
> intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by 
> telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message 
> that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty 
> or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent 
> messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes made after they 
> were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail 
> transmission, viruses, etc.
>