From: Andrea A. <and...@ge...> - 2012-10-14 12:03:06
|
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jody Garnett <jod...@gm...>wrote: > It's not about accepting your own pull request, what worries me most is > changes in the referencing module > which seem to be directed mostly by the haste of the moment than by a good > understanding of what > needs fixing and how. > Commits are also not directly related to the jiras being opened, for > example it's hard to tell what > happened with https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4286, has it been > reverted? > One final worry bit is that the changes to referencing do not seem to be > covered by their own tests > > +1. Seems like a faux paux to me to apply these pull requests without > review from the module maintainer. Especially a module as core as > referencing. > > I applied a pull request to gt-wms, and was waiting for andrea on the one > involving gt-referencing, since he is busy I backed out those changes and > made a new pull request. > > The "wish" for the change to ft-referencing still stands. > > When working in the debugger with the various Envelope classes I would > like to know what CRS they are working with (even if it is just provided by > CRS.toSRS method). > No problem with that. But I don't understand the change you wanted to make to CRS, it seems it contained bits that were backed out too, kind of confusing. > > Trying out that idea, shows two test cases are effected (they were > checking toSting output). > Which is a bad idea, the tests should be modified to check the actual ordinates, not the toString output. Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it ------------------------------------------------------- |