Re: [Geotools-devel] Hardening WFS store, on 2.7.x

[Jody G. <jod...@gm...>]

+1 it is in unsupported exactly because this kind of work is needed.

--
Jody Garnett

On 19/06/2012, at 7:00 PM, Andrea Aime <and...@ge...> wrote:

Hi,
in a recent thread we discussed ways to increase testing of the WFS data
store:
http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Wfs-data-store-testing-request-validity-td4977826.html

Now, the potential funding I have for this is linked to doing the work on
2.7.x.
Of the two approaches presented in the previous thread, per test http
server,
or change the code to use the HTTPClient interface, I do prefer the latter,
but it's more invasive code wise.

Having the resources to follow just one path, what would you recommend?
Setup the uglier per test http server, so that the WFS code is not changed,
or go for the cleaner HTTPClient path, that does not requires changes to
the WFS store internal API on the stable series?

I am inclined to go for the second, since the store is in unsupported land
anyways, but thought I'd ask

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead

Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy

phone: +39 0584 962313
fax:      +39 0584 962313
mob:    +39 339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
Geo...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel