From: Justin D. <jde...@op...> - 2011-08-27 16:31:13
|
Yup, makes sense. On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Andrea Aime <and...@ge...>wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jde...@op...> > wrote: > > +1 on having ContentFeatureCollection check for a -1 result and fallback > to > > doing the full scan/count. > > Btw... shouldn't we do the same for getBounds()? It now returns null if the > content feature source return null (which it can, if the computation is > "too > expensive") > > Cheers > Andrea > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------- > Ing. Andrea Aime > GeoSolutions S.A.S. > Tech lead > > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 > 55054 Massarosa (LU) > Italy > > phone: +39 0584 962313 > fax: +39 0584 962313 > > http://www.geo-solutions.it > http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ > http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT > http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime > http://twitter.com/geowolf > > ------------------------------------------------------- > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. |