From: Andrea A. <and...@ge...> - 2010-12-26 09:27:31
|
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Jody Garnett <jod...@gm...> wrote: > Can I ask for a review of https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3364 > > One of the things getting in the way of conversation with Niels was the request to add a method to PropertyName. > > Turns out that almost all of the interfaces we are interested in talking about are part of geoapi-pending (almost to be expected since we are bound to have fun as we implement app-schema). > > The above jira creates a "gt-util" module; with the interfaces from geoapi-pending; the license remains with the OGC etc... > > I would like to ask for review (or approval) to commit the above; and then look at taking some of the low level "utility" classes out of "metadata"; for details see the jira report. -1 based on the chosen module name. I see gt-util, without knowing anything, and I assume it's a sort of hodge podge set of utility classes, that is, implementation helpers, not interfaces. If I may propose an alternative, why don't we create a gt-geoapi module and stick all of geoapi (not just pending) inside of it? Possibly not the current GeoApi, but the one that we actually implement. Then we pull the plug and remove all dependencies from that project Cheers Andrea ----------------------------------------------------- Ing. Andrea Aime Senior Software Engineer GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584962313 fax: +39 0584962313 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf ----------------------------------------------------- |