From: Jody G. <jod...@gm...> - 2009-05-22 06:44:23
|
Hi Michael: We encountered this before; with respect to the contributions of Bryce. Here is what we came up with: - Public domain contributions (ie gov employees) individual code: can sign w/ no conflict as themselves gov code: already public domain - OSGeo does not need a license treat on a case by case basis Just like some of the files credit (c) Refractions in the header (for my earlier work); the files Bryce worked on have the following (Example from GeoTiffException): /* * GeoTools - The Open Source Java GIS Toolkit * http://geotools.org * * (C) 2005-2008, Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo) * * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; * version 2.1 of the License. * * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU * Lesser General Public License for more details. */ /* * NOTICE OF RELEASE TO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN * * This work was created by employees of the USDA Forest Service's * Fire Science Lab for internal use. It is therefore ineligible for * copyright under title 17, section 105 of the United States Code. You * may treat it as you would treat any public domain work: it may be used, * changed, copied, or redistributed, with or without permission of the * authors, for free or for compensation. You may not claim exclusive * ownership of this code because it is already owned by everyone. Use this * software entirely at your own risk. No warranty of any kind is given. * * A copy of 17-USC-105 should have accompanied this distribution in the file * 17USC105.html. If not, you may access the law via the US Government's * public websites: * - http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#105 * - http://www.gpoaccess.gov/uscode/ (enter "17USC105" in the search box.) */ On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Michael Bedward <mic...@gm...> wrote: > Hello folks, > > Somewhere back in this thread I mentioned contacting Steve Ansari > about some nice vector to raster code that he posted on the user list > last year. Steve is happy for this code to go into the library (Jody > suggested it join the raster to vector code in the process module) so > I pointed him to the contributor's agreement. > > I've just heard back from Steve and, as a US Govt employee, he feels > that he can't proceed with the agreement. Apparently, his employer > views the code as being in the public domain so it's fine for us to > use it but not possible for him to sign over intellectual property > (I'm cc-ing this to Steve and he can correct me if I've mangled that). > > Steve wondered if I could take ownership of the code to get around > this, while he could still field queries about it and (I hope) benefit > from any improvements that we come up with. Is that kosher ? Any > other suggestions ? > > cheers > Michael > |