Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules reassigned

[Raif S. N. <ra...@fo...>]

hello Andrea,

when you say that modules/plugin/wfs will be moved to unsupported, when 
is that likely to happen?

it's probably too early to tell, but if/when it happens will it be 
before or after a stable GeoServer 2 is released?


On Sunday 17 May 2009 20:12:52 Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> in this mail I'm trying to summarize which unmaintained
> modules are going to be reassigned (or which modules
> get a one more maintainer).
>
> demo/mappane-use -> mbedward
> modules/library/coverage -> simboss, mbedward
> modules/library/jdbc -> aaime
> modules/library/metadata -> jgarnett
> modules/library/referencing -> aaime, simboss
> modules/plugin/epsg-extension -> aaime
> modules/plugin/epsg-hsql -> aaime
> modules/plugin/epsg-postgresql -> aaime
> modules/plugin/referencing3D  -> simboss
> modules/plugin/wfs -> groldan (and move to unsupported)
> modules/plugin/wms -> jgarnett (move to extension?)
> modules/unsupported/caching -> egouge
> modules/unsupported/coverageio-hdf -> simboss
> modules/unsupported/coverageio-netcdf -> simboss
> modules/unsupported/coverageio -> simboss
> modules/unsupported/mappane -> mbedward
> modules/unsupported/temporal -> dromagnoli
>
> One module is not scheduled for be removed, nor to
> be reassigned, this is not good:
> demo/libraryJTS
> Mumble... anyone taking this up? Maybe going to be
> merged with example?
>
> Also the modules/unsupported/ogr should be taken
> over by Debasish Sahu, which has expressed such
> interest with me by private mail, but so far he
> did not show up on the mailing list to officially
> ask for this. Let's wait some more, if worse comes
> to worse I still have some interest in this module
> (thought not sure if I have enough time).
>
> Again, since people are stepping up to take those
> modules I would expect them to change the poms
> at the earliest convenience.


cheers;
rsn