Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding SE 1.1 functions to main

[Jody G. <jga...@re...>]

johann.sorel wrote:
>> Johann I have been trying to talk to you about the last remaining 
>> design decisions with respect to variable length functions - 
>> basically since you started the work. If you notice in my email below 
>> I am making a decision to treat the number of parameters as a MINIMUM 
>> value - will that work out for you.
>>
> I've already tryed to add this special check in the function 
> contructor a month ago when we tryed the categorize function. But the 
> Function discovery mecanism raised an error so I haven't push further 
> in the expression/filterfactory code. (we exchanged a few mails about 
> this).
I recall the emails; I don't think we made a decision?
> If you can fix thoses minimum values check then Yes it is a good thing.
I can fix the minimum value checks (fixing code is easy :-) making a 
decision is hard :-( ).
>> We are running into some inconsistencies with the style interface 
>> after your recent deprecations; my co-worker will send the details.
> I'm not surprised, only deprecating methods/classes and not providing 
> the new ones doesn't help. The new methods and implementations fix are 
> in the patch for 2.6.x .
That will be okay for uDig work (since we are staying on the 2.6.x train).
Jody