|
From: andrea a. <and...@gm...> - 2008-05-26 17:24:25
|
>> Thanks, I already browsed those once and I missed the importance of >> 01format. > > Okay; just be sure you understand that it is an unmaintained mess so Format > may not actually be important at all (ie it may be a design element that was > ignored while everyone just uses GridCoverageReaders directly ....). That is > what uDig was forced to do... Ok, got you. >> Hmm... wcs... I like that... for udig? :) >> > > For GeoTools; but it would be the data access api that uDig would use. My > problem is I was unwilling to do the work until I had a buddy that knew > something about coverages along for the ride :-) He, he, he... now I'm afraid. What about coming to Italy to the code sprint in a few weeks and have a great fun on all this? :) [...] >> Thanks Jody, I will first have to study a bit though, don't want to >> torment you before I do not have a better picture on the coverage-imageio >> "mappings". >> > > Gottcha - I am on that mailing list as well; and it is pretty heady stuff. >> >> One question though: I didn't expect that many deprecated classes at that >> level. I checked out the arcgrid plugin and there are some of them. Is that >> ok? I'm pretty sure I have the right code.... but... >> > > See above; it is a mess; I think the deprecated classes are the only ones > that work or some such? This code is by far the worst from a user point of > view ... good thing it performs so well. :) Alright, then I go on without worring too much. In the meanwhile I gave a look at the ArcGrid plugin and it looks very nice to me... thank God it seems that the heavy part is on the imageio part. Andrea > > Jody > |