From: Andrea A. <aa...@op...> - 2008-04-24 08:46:36
|
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > Its look like that a new method has been added in the Function interface > (see attached diff), and GeoTools implementation do not yet implement it. > > Given that the documentation in the returns tag said "Optional", I > assume that it is okay to just implement them as "return null" in GeoTools. Sigh, that's why I asked for a proposal for the geoapi stuff... this way you're going to break GT2 api without the proper process, which is not acceptable. For the moment, if you really need to hack GeoApi hard, can't we deploy a tagged release of geoapi and make geotools depend on that? Cheers Andrea |