From: Martin D. (JIRA) <ji...@co...> - 2007-10-19 10:26:50
|
Consider moving GenericName and Record implementations in a "name" subpackage ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: GEOT-1526 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1526 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Wish Components: core metadata Affects Versions: 2.5-M0 Reporter: Martin Desruisseaux Assignee: Martin Desruisseaux Priority: Minor The {{org.geotools.util}} package is becoming larger and larger. It may be helpfull to dispatch some of its classes in subpackages. This proposal is about creating a new package: * {{org.geotools.util.name}} and move there the following classes. We would take this opportunity for renaming some implementation classes that currently have the same name than the interface they implement. * {{NameFactory}} * {{GenericName}} (to be renamed: {{AbstractName}}? {{GenericNameImpl}}?) * {{LocalName}} (to be renamed: {{DefaultLocalName}}? {{LocalNameImpl}}?) * {{ScopedName}} (to be renamed: {{DefaultScopedName}}? {{ScopedNameImpl}}?) * {{MemberNameImpl}} (or {{DefaultMemberName}}?) * {{RecordTypeImpl}} (or {{DefaultRecordType}}?) More implementations may be added later: * {{Record}} * {{NameSpace}} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |