[Geotools-devel] Legal issues (was 2.4-M0 stuff)

[Adrian C. <ac...@gm...>]

Hey Jody,

We need to talk about legal stuff in a couple of days, probably by phone
not to exclude anyone but to be efficient.

I am currently working on the latest draft of the Copyright assignment
document. That work has mushroomed into writing an overview of the
situation and designing the legal framework for geotools down the road
(e.g. permission letters, file header wordings and package
documentation. Your help will be useful in this second part (i.e. do we
need a LICENSE file and an LGPL file in every package/module/zip?). We
will need to come up with a good plan and then get everyone to buy into
to it.

More when I finish this work,

--adrian

On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 11:56 -0700, Jody Garnett wrote:
> - README still does not work in notepad, we should move to a README.html 
> just to get over this problem
> - No LICENSE.txt in root (this is a problem for the bin download as well 
> - acuster will kick me if I don't point it out). Their are a few in here 
> (modules/library/main/LICENSE.txt and 
> modules/library/main/SOSNOSKILICENSE.TXT)...
> - pom.xml files not viewable in notepad
> - I will report back after my mvn clean install is finished ....
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> Geo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel