From: Martin D. <mar...@ge...> - 2007-05-27 16:15:10
|
Adrian Custer a écrit : > The OSGeo board met last Friday to consider my proposal for the Geotools > Copyright Assignment document. They took some decisions which they > needed to take and decided, going forward, the process should be: > (...snip...) Thanks a lot to Adrian, Frank and everyone whos put their effort in this process!! > To cover past contributions, we get as many of us as possible to sign > the copyright assignment document. That, plus a refresh of the > provenance review and some champagne should get us to graduate! Sound fine :) > To cover future contributions, we adopt the following strategy: > > We require, to maintain or gain svn access after a cutoff date > (say Oct 1st), that all contributors sign: > > 1) The copyright assignment document to OSGeo, > > 2) A geotools only document that commits those with svn > access to behave responsibly: to deal with the community > politely, to deal with svn respectfully, i.e. follow > developer guidelines) and make only legal and clean > commits (i.e. third-party code is well documented, no > submarine patents)... > > 3) A yearly renewal document of the copyright assignment > covering the past year's commits. > > while this involves more paperwork, the strategy should provide as solid > a legal foundation for our code as we possibly can create. Also, an > added advantage of the yearly renewal is to automatically triage > inactive contributors. Sound fine to me as well. Martin |