From: <pao...@am...> - 2005-06-23 13:29:44
|
> ..... > I'd also like to see validation, and then yes, the > sandbox is a good idea - I was articulating it more as a 'peer review' > section, but I think it's the same idea - changes for someone else to > approve and commit. We (me and Luca) are also thinking of integrating a workflow engine of some sort, so the approve and commit may be managed by it. But it may prove too difficult, at least as a first phase... > Another feature I think we'd like (we're basically > going for an open geodata collaborative platform - wiki for maps, easy > to use, but powerful enough to be 'real', do validation and peer review > and all) is the equivalent of JIRA's 'watching' - you could subscribe > to an area of the map that you knew about, and would be send updates > whenever someone edited that. This is really interesting, we never thought it that way, but yes that would be very powerful. We have different offices of the Municipality doing things on the same areas, and with this subscription mechanism one can be kept informed of what others are doing. We should consider it!!! Bye Paolo |