Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] Is it me or is the CSW common query language just wrong in 2.2.0? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Francois-Xavier P. <fra...@ca...>]

Hi Stephen, 

On jeu, 2008-08-07 at 16:33 +1000, Ste...@ga... wrote:

> CQLParser is in the org.z3950.zing.cql package. Google takes me to
> http://zing.z3950.org/cql/intro.html . It may be just me but Zing CQL
> IS NOT the same as OGC CQL as specified by CSW 2.0.1 (OGC 04-021r3).
As mentionned by Andrea some times ago
http://www.nabble.com/CSW-2.0.1-test-server-td8975277.html#a8975277
"the CQL implementation is far from good (the library
we use it pretty naive). This has some limitations (for example you
cannot search words that contain spaces)."

Maybe we should plan for migration to GeoTools CQL parser instead of the
zing one ?
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/02+CQL+Utility+Class

Then we could plan to convert FE to Lucene query for filter and CQL to
FE to Lucene query for CQL ?

Any thougths ?

Francois