Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] Proposal to support CSW 2.0.2

[Francois-Xavier P. <fra...@ca...>]

Hi Archie, have you been in touch with Zhuhua who proposed a patch one
month ago for adding transaction and harvest operations to the CSW service ?
http://www.nabble.com/the-csw-action-%3A-Transaction-and-harvest.-td15602186s18419.html#a15602186

If not, maybe Zhuhua you could post your patch to the trac
(http://trac.osgeo.org/geonetwork/wiki/proposals) and someone could
review it ?

+1 for CSW 2.0.2.

Cheers. Francois

Archie Warnock wrote:
> Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
>> Thanks for the proposal. Before giving my OK, I would like to more 
>> specifically know what classes and what XSL, XML and XSD files are 
>> affected. Could you provide a listing of the affected files? How many 
>> files are affected by the change? Does the ISO profile also work with 
>> this change?
> 
> Good idea.  Here's the output of svn's status command (ignoring 
> transient changes, like to WEB-INF/ and images/):
> 
>> bash-3.2$ svn status
>> M      src/org/fao/geonet/kernel/csw/CatalogDispatcher.java
>> M      src/org/fao/geonet/kernel/csw/services/DescribeRecord.java
>> M      src/org/fao/geonet/kernel/csw/services/getrecords/CatalogSearcher.java
>> M      src/org/fao/geonet/kernel/csw/services/getrecords/FieldMapper.java
>> M      src/org/fao/geonet/kernel/csw/services/getrecords/SearchController.java
>> M      src/org/fao/geonet/kernel/csw/services/GetRecords.java
>> M      src/org/fao/geonet/kernel/csw/services/GetRecordById.java
>> M      src/org/fao/geonet/csw/common/Csw.java
>> M      src/org/fao/geonet/csw/client/MainFrame.java
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/schemas/dublin-core/index-fields.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/schemas/dublin-core/dc.xsd
>>     S  web/geonetwork/xml/validation/gml
>>     S  web/geonetwork/xml/validation/filter
>>     S  web/geonetwork/xml/validation/ows
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/validation/readme.txt
>> A      web/geonetwork/xml/validation/csw/2.0.2
>> A      web/geonetwork/xml/validation/csw/2.0.2/rec-dcmes.xsd
>> A      web/geonetwork/xml/validation/csw/2.0.2/rec-dcterms.xsd
>> A      web/geonetwork/xml/validation/csw/2.0.2/csw-2.0.2.xsd
>> D      web/geonetwork/xml/validation/csw/2.0.1
>> D      web/geonetwork/xml/validation/csw/2.0.1/rec-dcmes.xsd
>> D      web/geonetwork/xml/validation/csw/2.0.1/csw-2.0.1.xsd
>> D      web/geonetwork/xml/validation/csw/2.0.1/rec-dcterms.xsd
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/iso19139/iso-full.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/iso19139/ogc-brief.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/iso19139/iso-brief.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/iso19139/ogc-summary.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/iso19139/iso-summary.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/iso19139/ogc-full.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/dublin-core/ogc-brief.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/dublin-core/ogc-summary.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/dublin-core/ogc-full.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/fgdc-std/ogc-brief.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/fgdc-std/ogc-summary.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/fgdc-std/ogc-full.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/iso19115/ogc-brief.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/iso19115/ogc-summary.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/schemas/iso19115/ogc-full.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/xml/csw/capabilities.xml
>> M      web/geonetwork/xsl/conversion/import/Convert_CSW-CITE_test_metadata.xsl
>> M      web/geonetwork/index.html
> 
> Note that most of the schema changes for the element sets are just 
> changes to the CSW namespace URI.
> 
> It ought to work the same with the ISO profile as the 2.0.1 code did but 
> I've only looked at it superficially.  The CITE test data is all Dublin 
> Core.
> 
> Either before or after check-in (your call) I can put an installation up 
> on my local server here and load it up with the GN sample data for more 
> widespread testing.
>