[GT] RE: Updated STO.pm

[Weigert, T. <we...@ms...>]

I realized that the STO was performing needless iterations in
calculate_interval, so the attached should be significantly faster on
longer intervals. I checked the output before and after and it is the
same.

Th.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weigert, Thomas
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 12:09 AM
> To: 'de...@ge...'
> Cc: Weigert, Thomas
> Subject: Updated STO.pm
> 
> I updated the STO.pm to use static dependencies and fixed the
dependencies
> stated, as I don't think they were quite right.
> 
> I believe that it would be better to swap the order of return
parameters,
> but I did not want to change the API of an existing indicator.
> 
> It would make sense to split out %K Fast as a separate module (as kw
had
> suggested) if that was an indicator in its own right. I guess we could
> compute a transformation on Williams %R, but I am not sure whether
this is
> worth it? Please advise.
> 
> Cheers, Th.