[Geneontology-gowebsite] [ geneontology-GO website-887074 ] annotation guide modification

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

GO website item #887074, was opened at 2004-01-29 16:17
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by gomidori
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=600519&aid=887074&group_id=36855

Category: request feature
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: annotation guide modification

Initial Comment:
Hi Midori,

We got this e-mail about the annotation guide. Would
you like to do it since you're in charge of the
annotation guide?

Jen

Hello,

Current GO annotation guide explains the use of
'contributes-to' under general recommendations; it
mentions that it should be entered in the qualifier
column and gives examples. However the table links and
the column title/example shown in color have NOT as the
title of column 4. The description of columns following
the colored column content/example picture  has
qualifier instead of not as the title. The description
however is mostly about NOT and so are the examples.  I
think it can be a bit confusing for people that don't
attend the consortium meetings and/or are new to the GO
annotation guide. Maybe it can be easily fixed.

 Thank you,

Victoria Petri

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Midori Harris (gomidori)
Date: 2004-07-08 14:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=436423

closing this - doc has been updated with examples for 'contributes_to' and 
'colocalizes_with' following Annotation Camp

m

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Midori Harris (gomidori)
Date: 2004-01-30 12:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=436423

The glaring errors (lingering 'NOT' instead of 'Qualifier'; typo) are now fixed. I'm leaving this item open, tho, because we do need more description/explanation for qualifiers other than NOT.

Also, I'm unassigning this from myself because technically I'm already on holiday. If no noe gets to it beforeI'm back, I might have time to take it back, but don't regard it as paws-off-it's-my-territory in the meantime. ;)

m

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark)
Date: 2004-01-30 11:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=735846

More for the annotation guide:

The following sentence appers in the annotation guide general 
recommendations section :

"An individual gene product that is part of a complex can be 
annotated to terms that describe the the action (function or 
process) of the complex. These annotations must include the entry 
'contributes_to' in the 'Qualifier' column (see below)."

1) The word "the" appears twice in a row.
2) The sentence appears to imply that the qualifier 'contributes_to' 
could be used with either function or process annotations.  It was 
my understanding that this qualifier was reserved for use only with 
function annotations.  If I am correct in my understanding, perhaps 
the documentation could be clarified here a bit?

-Doug


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark)
Date: 2004-01-30 10:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=735846

More for the annotation guide:

The following sentence appers in the annotation guide general 
recommendations section :

"An individual gene product that is part of a complex can be 
annotated to terms that describe the the action (function or 
process) of the complex. These annotations must include the entry 
'contributes_to' in the 'Qualifier' column (see below)."

1) The word "the" appears twice in a row.
2) The sentence appears to imply that the qualifier 'contributes_to' 
could be used with either function or process annotations.  It was 
my understanding that this qualifier was reserved for use only with 
function annotations.  If I am correct in my understanding, perhaps 
the documentation could be clarified here a bit?

-Doug


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=600519&aid=887074&group_id=36855