gen2j-development Mailing List for Gen2J
Brought to you by:
boocockp
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|
|
From: Paul B. <pa...@as...> - 2002-02-14 16:50:02
|
News this week... I have placed another "nearly to first base" version on the Gen2J website, which has partial entity update functionality working. Download it from http://gen2j.sourceforge.net/preview/gen2j-0.8.2.zip. Stacy spent an afternoon with me earlier this week looking at Gen2J, and he is starting to look at one of the most important new development areas - rewriting some of the core processing in Java instead of XSLT. This is important because the XSLT core is (a) slow and (b) close to unmaintainable. I think that there are still many important uses for XSLT in the project, such as generating code, views and documentation, but the core XMI model generation tasks are just stretching it too far. (And he's got a new job...congratulations!) An issue, if anyone has an opinion: Gen2J needs an input XMI file produced by a UML case tool. As these beasties are heavyweight, have a learning curve and cost $250 - $sky-high, would a different means of input be useful? My first idea was for the user to write bare-bones Java classes with specialised Javadoc tags, and then create a doclet to turn this into the XMI input for Gen2J. Writing code might be preferred by the hard-core developer types anyway... Any thoughts? Cheers Paul3 Paul Boocock Ashridge Technologies Ltd Phone +44 1727 846706 Mobile +44 7802 872093 www.ashridgetech.com |