From: Rich M. <jp...@gm...> - 2010-12-11 23:03:23
|
On 11/09/2010 10:46 PM, Geoffrey Biggs wrote: > Hi Rich, > > On 10/11/10 12:18, Rich Mattes wrote: >> Hi Geoff, >> >> I noticed that in one of your commits the licensing of hokuyo_aist >> changed to EPL. I remember reading somewhere that the EPL is >> incompatible with the GPL, so I started to do some digging. Based on >> section 3 in [1], it looks like any GPL program that's linked with EPL >> code cannot be redistributed. If this is the case, then distributions >> can't, for instance, redistribute Player (which has GPL bits) built >> against hokuyo_aist from Gearbox 10.11. This point of view is backed up >> in [2]. Is there any possibility of dual-licensing it as LGPL + EPL or >> something? >> >> It does look like the LGPL is compatible with the EPL, but I can't find >> as much information on that > That's a bit of a problem. My choice for license was LGPL (or, if > pushed, BSD), but AIST's policy is to use EPL because it has the patent > protection clause. I may be able to get permission to use another > license if I have a good reason, and I think that being able to > distribute it in Player is good enough. > > Geoff > > Any updates on this? Rich |