RE: [Algorithms] Prism problems...
Brought to you by:
vexxed72
From: <Pau...@sc...> - 2005-11-21 12:50:49
|
gda...@li... wrote on 21/11/2005 12:10:21: > As far as I understand it, it should be the same, since I would obtain > the reversed vector, that for the purposes of SAT tests should be > basically the same... But I'll try it... You might be right... Quite difficult to debug SAT, theres nothing visually you can do to see where things have gone wrong. This is why i like the minkoski difference approach - you can draw the MD and its obvious when you have made a mistake because the MD isn't a closed hull. I'm not suggesting that you move to a MD approach, just waxing lyrical, really... Anyone know a nice way to debug SAT? Ta, Paul. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify pos...@sc... This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for all known viruses. ********************************************************************** Sony Computer Entertainment Europe |