From: <a.o...@bl...> - 2005-03-17 20:37:33
|
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 06:53:20PM +0100, Albert Herranz wrote: > Uhmm, when looking at the current table that's not > true for already existing entries. The table is really > not sorted by pvr_value. > > But looking at arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S I see that the > identify_cpu function stops on first match. So > specific entries (with a deeper mask) must be placed > _before_ more generic ones. > > So at the end you are right. Gekko must be put before > 745/755. > Correct. I couldn't have put that better :) > PS: Any comments about the recently commited EXI > framework? Haven't really looked at it. Probably later on during the day as I catch up with my swamp of mail :( |