From: Alexandre B. <al...@bo...> - 2004-04-13 17:21:50
|
Selon Steven Looman <st...@kr...>:=20 =20 > There already was a psoloadv1.1 port which also works, and a few=20 days=20 > ago psoloadv2.0 for linux was (finally) released.=20 =20 Unfortunately, i feel that psoload2.0 has one of the worst network=20 code ever : it chooses the network interface it'll use in a really=20 strange and unefficient way, that makes it completelly unusable if=20 you've got more than one network interface. I personally used it just=20 5 minutes, and switched back to psoload1.1 until the Action Replay=20 bootloader is a stable solution (psoload1.1 has the same problems, but=20 they are a little less present, and doesn't makes me unable to use=20 it).=20 |