From: Franck <ro...@de...> - 2004-01-25 18:04:01
|
erf, the message has forked :/ On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:19:46 +0100, Richard Eng wrote: > I really prefer the two-level Linux way of doing it, simply because I think > it's > more clean. I my opinion the first level should not be aware of the > different > interrupts for the different devices. This should be up to the specific > driver to deal with. > Isn't it quite obvious that it's up to the second level dvd driver (or > whatever driver) to find out if it's a > dvd_transfer_complete or a dvd_transfer_error interrupt? > I agree with that, and even if the numbers of interrupts are fixed and there's no way to add foreign hardware, we should keep the Linux way to handle interrupts... > This is just my point of view anyway.... And mine, but we need more opinions about that, the drivers part depends on that and we should take care of it ;) Franck |