From: Massimiliano C. <mas...@gm...> - 2010-06-30 15:38:48
|
Hi all! I'm reading this http://gate.ac.uk/sale/tao/splitch13.html#sec:gazetteers:hash but there is something not much clear to me: "On first sight it seems that this algorithm is certainly much more memory-consuming than a finite state machine (FSM) (...) but this is actually not so important (...) On the other hand, one advantage of the algorithm is that, although unconventional, on average it takes four times less memory and works three times faster than an optimized FSM implementation." Thus, "the strange idea of Atanas Kiryakov, that searching in HashMaps will be faster than a search in a Finite State Machine (FSM)" is right or not? Is the Hash Gazetteer fast and low-memory consuming or what? Massi |