RE: [GD-General] Faster and faster

[Stefan B. <Ste...@di...>]

   FWIW, I haven't found the Intel compilers to be any better than the =
Microsoft compiler. The compilers are more than "good enough" for =
writing all your code in. If you need to access low-level functionality =
you can almost always do this using compiler intrinsics, so there's =
rarely necessary to resort to inline or out-of-line assembly.
=20
/Stefan

________________________________

From: gam...@li... on behalf of =
CAVEY GERARD
Sent: Thu 7/22/2004 4:18 PM
To: 'gam...@li...'
Subject: [GD-General] Faster and faster


Hi
I would like hear someone s experience about INTEL compilers=20
performance when targetting AMD cpus, without using SSE/SSE2.
Is it good enough ?
While some key functions (dot ,cross products ,matrices maths...) can be =
written by hand
, i would like to relay on a good compiler for the other things.
Thanks for reading
GC.


*************************************************************************=

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont
confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires.
Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est interdite.=20
Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration.=20
SG Asset Management et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite au =
titre de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie.

D=E9couvrez l'offre et les services de SG Asset Management sur le site =
www.sgam.fr=20

                                ********

This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and
intended solely for the addressees.
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.=20
E-mails are susceptible to alteration.=20
Neither SG Asset Management nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates =
shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.=20

*************************************************************************=