Re: [GD-General] Clean way of generalizing CDECL

[<cas...@ya...>]

--- Brian Hook <ho...@bo...> wrote: 
> > Why don't you try:
> >
> > void __attribute__((cdecl)) foo( int x, int y, int z );
> >
> > :)
> 
> Err...hmmm, is that standard across all GCC incarnations?  The man
> pages I read indicated it had to be a suffix, but if not...well, that
> simplifies things =)

Hmm... I'm not totally sure. I think the documentation
(http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Extensions.html) is not completely
clear, but apparently that works at least on recent gcc versions. I've been
using that for some time. So, please, let me know if you find any issue!

Thanks,

--
Ignacio Castaño
cas...@ya...



	
	
		
______________________________________________
Yahoo! lanza su nueva tecnología de búsquedas
¿te atreves a comparar?
http://busquedas.yahoo.es