RE: [GD-General] Variables scope

[CAVEY G. <GER...@sg...>]

>Kristoffer Gr=F6nlund wrote:
>
>>The way I've worked around this in the past has been by redefining =
for as
>>follows:
>>#define for if (false) {} else for
>>
>>Yes, it's a hideously ugly hack, but so is the problem in the first =
place.
>>I've never had any problems because of it.
>> =20
>>
>Hmm... sounds like an ugly solution for something that is more simply=20
>solved by just
>declaring the loop counter outside the for.

Hi=20
As Mr Aravelo(pyrostudios) told me out of list
it can also be written=20
#define for if (1) for
a bit simpler ...
I didn t update VC 6.0 yet but maybe that the latest service pack=20
can avoid the workaround.
Anyway I d better wait to get VS.NET
Thanks for your help

Regards
GC


************************************************************************=
*
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont
confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires.
Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est interdite.=20
Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration.=20
SG Asset Management et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite au =
titre
de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie.

D=E9couvrez l'offre et les services de SG Asset Management sur le site
www.sgam.fr=20

				********

This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and
intended solely for the addressees.
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.=20
E-mails are susceptible to alteration.  =20
Neither SG Asset Management nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates =
shall
be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.=20

************************************************************************=
*