Re: XML parsing speed was RE: [GD-General] RE: A portable preferences library but has nothing to do
Brought to you by:
vexxed72
From: Alen L. <ale...@cr...> - 2003-12-17 07:47:47
|
> The code in question does: > > sz = get_size_of_file () > read (h, buf, sz) > parse (buf) > > As such load and parse are entirely separate. I see. > This is an old slow machine, a PII-333 -- I said it was far from > cutting-edge. Frankly, I'd like to have that to be more like at least 10-20MB/s on a Celeron 733. Not to mention some even slower CPUs, that most of us would like it to run on. ;) > > A 40xCDROM... > > I was reading from disk possibly NFS over 100bT (can't check right now, > don't have access to that machine from where I am now). That machine > doesn't have a CD. I mentioned the 40xCD as a yardstick to compare the speed against. It is deemed as something very slow, and your CPU activity while loading should always have much better throughput than that. Alen > > ... has transfer rate of 6MB/s. You say you are parsing data at that > > rate? Those are certainly not some impressive numbers. :( > > Certainly they're not impressive. They weren't intended to be. I > suggest you check them on a more representative host with code that > wasn't written as quickly as possible and for data that more closely > matches your loads. > > -- > J C Lawrence > ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. > cl...@ka... He lived as a devil, eh? > http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Gamedevlists-general mailing list > Gam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gamedevlists-general > Archives: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=557 > |