Re: XML was RE: [GD-General] RE: A portable preferences library b ut has nothing to do with them anymore

[Jorrit T. <Jor...@uz...>]

Gareth Lewin wrote:

>But I think the point has been missed. The issue here (the reason I entered
>this discussion) was that not only the data format was (imo) bad (text file
>not parsed) but a lot of proccessing goes on with the data. He mentioned
>kd-tree generation for example.
>
>Hell, why not just pre-generate the kd-tree and store that into the xml ?
>Surely that is a step in the right direction ?
>  
>
As I explained in another mail I cannot do that because the kd-tree is 
not fixed.
Depending on hardware configuration a different kd-tree setup may be 
selected.
But it doesn't matter. kdtree calculation is VERY fast.

Greetings,