[GD-General] Re: asset & document management
Brought to you by:
vexxed72
From: Enno R. <en...@de...> - 2003-06-06 20:05:31
|
Garett Bass wrote: >>Then I found Sharepont... > > Subversion and a Linux server sounds like a cheap alternative. As soon as I > get my Linux box up, I'll try it out. I would install it on a Windows XP > box, but I can't afford to install XP Service Pack 1. Perhaps I too will > someday be able to afford Windows servers :P Subversion is okay for managing code and assets. CVS is still better for us, because we need cvs annotate (aka cvs blame), and subversion does not have that yet. But it looks like whenever subversion is good enough, migration from CVS will not be difficult. But Sharepoint is supposed to solve another problem. CVS does a good job of keeping versions, but it's not a good tool for documentation management. In Sharepoint, I can orgnaize documents much better, I get a nice portal with search functionality that even our marketing folks can use, and I get features like the alerts - notifications when somebody changes a certain document that I've shown an interest in. Plus, I can file documents with meta-data, like keywords, production status, etc. that I can search or organize them by. CVS or subverion could be a nice part of the backend for this. If I'd make my own, it would come out somewhere as a mix between a mySQL database to store the metadata, CVS to keep the versions, and some portal features like in phpBB. Enno. |